Year 2022 / Volume 114 / Number 6
Original
Comparison of phenotypes and outcomes following resection of incidental versus symptomatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

317-322

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8096/2021

Luis Hurtado-Pardo, Charles E. Breeze, Javier A Cienfuegos, Alberto Benito, Víctor Valentí, Pablo Martí-Cruchaga, Gabriel Zozaya, Fernando Martínez Regueira, Fernando Pardo, Fernando Rotellar Sastre,

Abstract
Background and aim: fifty to 70 percent of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are diagnosed incidentally. The objective of this study was to compare the phenotype and oncological outcomes of incidental versus symptomatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Methods: a retrospective study was performed, identifying all incidental and symptomatic tumors resected between 2000 and 2019. Baseline characteristics, symptoms, operative variables and pathological stage were all recorded. Patterns of recurrence and overall and disease-free survival were analyzed in both groups. Results: fifty-one incidental and 45 symptomatic pancreatic tumor resections were performed. Symptomatic tumors were more frequent in females (29 vs 17; p = 0.005) and younger patients (median years; 50 vs 58; p = 0.012) and were detected at a more advanced stage (p = 0.027). There were no differences in location and most resections (n = 49; 51 %) were performed laparoscopically. There were no operative mortalities and 17 (17.7 %) severe complications (≥ IIIb on the Clavien-Dindo classification) were recorded with no differences between the two groups. With a median follow-up of 64.4 months (range 13.5-90), overall survival at five and ten years was 89.7 % and 72.8 % for the non-incidental tumors and 80.9 % and 54.6 % for the incidental tumors (p = ns), respectively. Disease-free survival in both groups (excluding M1a) was 71.2 % and 47.5 %, and 93.7 % and 78.1 %, respectively (p = ns). Conclusions: symptomatic tumors are more frequent in females and present at more advanced pathological stages. There were no significant differences in overall and disease-free survival between the two groups. Resection of incidental tumors ≥ 1.5-2 cm seems advisable, although each case should be assessed on an individual basis.
Share Button
New comment
Comments
No comments for this article
References
1. Cloyd JM, Poultsides GA. The Landmark Series: Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:1039-1049.
2. Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, et al. Trends in the Incidence, Prevalence, and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:1335–1342. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0589..
3. Aziz H, Howe JR, Pawlik TM. Surgery vs Observation for Patients With Small Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. JAMA Surg 2021;156:412-413. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5640..
4. Howe JR, Merchant NB, Conrad C, et al. The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Paper on the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Pancreas 2020;49:1–33..
5. Hurtado-Pardo L, Cienfuegos JA, Antoñanzas J, et al. Incidental lesions of the pancreas. A clinicopathological study of 100 cases surgically treated. Revi Esp Enferm Digest 2020;112:85-89. doi: 10.17235/reed.2019.6118/2018
6. Barturen Á. Incidental pancreatic lesions - A diagnostic and management challenge. Rev Esp Enferm Digest; 2020;112:83–84.
7. Rotellar F, Pardo F, Montiel C, et al. Totally laparoscopic roux-en-Y duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after middle pancreatectomy: A consecutive nine-case series at a single institution. Ann Surg 2008;247:938-944.
8. Cienfuegos JA, Salguero J, Núñez-Córdoba JM, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic organ-sparing resection in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 2017;31:3847-3857.
9. Kimura W, Inoue T, Futakawa N, et al. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein. Surgery 1996;120:885–890.
10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–213.
11. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery 2017;161:584–591..
12. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2007;142:761–8.
13. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007;142:20–25.
14. Kloppel, G, Adsay NV, Couvelard A, et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: introduction. In:WHO Classification of Tumours. Digestive System Tumours.WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. 5th ed. Lyon (France) International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2019:343–346.
15. Falconi M, Eriksson B, Kaltsas G, et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Patients with Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Neuroendocrinology 2016;103:153–71.
16. Rindi G, Klimstra DS, Abedi-Ardekani B, et al. A common classification framework for neuroendocrine neoplasms: an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) expert consensus proposal. Mod Pathol 2018;31:1770–1786.
17. Wolters U, Wolf T, Stützer H, et al. ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth 1996;77:217–22..
18. Association AD. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes care 2012;35 Suppl 1:S64-71.
19. Crippa S, Partelli S, Zamboni G, et al. Incidental diagnosis as prognostic factor in different tumor stages of nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors. Surgery 2014;155:145–153.
20. Birnbaum DJ, Gaujoux S, Cherif R, et al. Sporadic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: prognostic significance of incidental diagnosis. Surgery 2014;155:13–21.
21. Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, et al. The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection. Ann Surg 2020;271:1–14.
22. Kneuertz PJ, Pitt HA, Bilimoria KY, et al. Risk of morbidity and mortality following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1727–35.
23. De Rooij T, Klompmaker S, Hilal MA, et al.. Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery for benign and malignant disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016;13:227–238. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26882881/..
24. Finkelstein P, Sharma R, Picado O, et al. Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (panNETs): Analysis of Overall Survival of Nonsurgical Management Versus Surgical Resection. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2017;21:855–866.
25. Sadot E, Reidy-Lagunes DL, Tang LH, et al. Observation versus Resection for Small Asymptomatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Matched Case-Control Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:1361–1370.
26. Kay BR, Witte DL. The impact of cancer biology, lead time bias, and length bias in the debate about cancer screening tests. J Insur Med 1991;23:102–4.
27. Kafadar K, Prorok PC. Effect of length biased sampling of unobserved sojourn times on the survival distribution when disease is screen detected. Stat Med 2009;28:2116–2146.
28. Assi HA, Mukherjee S, Kunz PL, et al. Surgery Versus Surveillance for Well-Differentiated, Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An 11-Year Analysis of the National Cancer Database. The oncologist 2020;25:e276–e283. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043766..
29. Dong DH, Zhang XF, Poultsides G, et al. Impact of tumor size and nodal status on recurrence of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors ≤2 cm after curative resection: A multi-institutional study of 392 cases. J Surg Oncol 2019;120:1071–1079.
30. Partelli S, Ramage JK, Massironi S, et al. Management of Asymptomatic Sporadic Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (ASPEN) ≤2 cm: Study Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study. Front Med 2020;7:1-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33425946..
Related articles

Letter

Lymphoepithelial cyst of the pancreas

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10091/2023

Letter

Retroperitoneal enterogenous cyst combined with teratoma

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9799/2023

Digestive Diseases Image

Imaging of pancreatic desmoid fibromatosis by endoscopic ultrasound

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9792/2023

Letter

Surgical indication of type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9681/2023

Letter

Intestinal obstruction due to pneumatosis intestinalis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9608/2023

Letter

Carcinoid syndrome and somatostatin analogues

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9525/2023

Letter

Duodenal stenosis surgical treatment in Crohn’s disease

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9521/2023

Editorial

Fewer endoscopists should perform more ERCPs

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9507/2022

Letter

Ectopic ACTH syndrome in a patient with Crohn’s disease

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8825/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

An unusual cause of a protuberant lesion of the gastric antrum

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8771/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor abscess

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8580/2022

Letter

Pancreatic lipoma: diagnostic boom of a rare mesenchymal tumor

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8536/2021

Letter

Gruber-Frantz tumor: a rare pancreatic neoplasm

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8345/2021

Digestive Diseases Image

Endoscopic resection of a duodenal neuroendocrine tumor

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8232/2021

Review

A review of the diagnosis and management of liver hydatid cyst

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.7896/2021

Letter

Radical surgery for liver hydatidosis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.7743/2020

Digestive Diseases Image

Duodenal diverticulum causing obstructive jaundice – Lemmel’s syndrome

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7516/2020

Digestive Diseases Image

A rare cause of extrahepatic biliary tract stricture: a neuroendocrine carcinoma

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6491/2019

Letter

Klatskin-mimicking neuroendocrine tumor

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6382/2019

Letter

Bezoar in incarcerated and complicated hiatal hernia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6159/2019

Letter

Pancreatic panniculitis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6116/2018

Editorial

Safe surgery for cystic tumors of the pancreas

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6042/2018

Digestive Diseases Image

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the main duct in a patient with pancreas divisum

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5959/2018

Letter to the Editor

Consequences of a Dieulafoy’s lesion in gastric surgery

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5442/2017

Letter to the Editor

Author´s reply: Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. A diagnostic challenge

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5415/2017

Letter to the Editor

Ectopic pancreas: a very unusual intestinal mass

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5353/2017

Letter to the Editor

A case of a mixed adenoneuroendocrine tumor of the colon

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5008/2017

Letter to the Editor

Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: keys issues in dealing with heterogeneity

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4997/2017

Letter to the Editor

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Prognostic factors

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5109/2017

Letter to the Editor

Abdominal compartment syndrome secondary to acute necrotizing pancreatitis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4810/2016

Letter to the Editor

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4725/2016

Editorial

Pancreas neuroendocrine tumors - not so rare or benign

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4672/2016

Original

Usefulness of an intra-gastric balloon before bariatric surgery

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4624/2016

Letter to the Editor

Unusual presentation of obstructive jaundice

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4501/2016

Letter to the Editor

Transanal submucosal endoscopic resection (TASER) by TEO system®

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4154/2015

Letter to the Editor

Gastric neuroendocrine tumor presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2015.3998/2015

Letter to the Editor

Minimally invasive treatment of rectovesical fistula: A case report

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4017/2015

Case Report

Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the rectum: an atypical histology

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.3975/2015

Citation tools
Hurtado-Pardo L, Breeze C, Cienfuegos J, Benito A, Valentí V, Martí-Cruchaga P, et all. Comparison of phenotypes and outcomes following resection of incidental versus symptomatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. 8096/2021


Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Metrics
This article has received 1927 visits.
This article has been downloaded 76 times.

Statistics from Dimensions


Statistics from Plum Analytics

Publication history

Received: 13/05/2021

Accepted: 12/07/2021

Online First: 28/07/2021

Published: 07/06/2022

Article revision time: 60 days

Article Online First time: 76 days

Article editing time: 390 days


Share
This article hasn't been rated yet.
Reader rating:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology is the official organ of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Cookie policy Privacy Policy Legal Notice © Copyright 2024 y Creative Commons. The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology