Year 2017 / Volume 109 / Number 7
Original
The impact of screening on short-term outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer

485-490

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4569/2016

Enric Sebastian, Ricard Courtier, Francesc Macià, Luís Grande, Miguel Pera,

Abstract
Aim: To investigate the influence of a screening program on the short-term outcome of patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Methods: Between April 2010 and December 2012 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer via the screening program (n = 80) were compared with patients diagnosed elsewhere (n = 106). Only patients of ≥ 50 and ≤ 69 years of age diagnosed outside the program were selected as controls. The clinical variables included age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, Charlson index, preoperative hemoglobin and serum albumin levels, surgical approach, tumor location and stage, perioperative transfusion and postoperative morbidity. A multivariate analysis was used to identify variables independently associated with outcome. Results: There were no significant differences with regard to age, sex and ASA status. Preoperative hemoglobin (14.1 ± 1.6 g/dl vs 12.3 ± 2.3 g/dl; p < 0.001) and serum albumin (4.45 ± 0.26 g/dl vs 4.0 ± 0.6 g/dl; p < 0.001) levels were significantly higher in the screening group. The overall morbidity was significantly lower in the screening group (38.8% vs 63.2; p < 0.001) and mainly related to a higher rate of Clavien-Dindo grade II complications in controls. There were no differences with regard to wound infection, postoperative ileus, anastomotic leakage or reoperations. The median length of hospital stay was shorter in the screening group (6 vs 9 days; p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that diagnosis outside the screening program, type of surgical procedure, open surgery and Charlson index were independent risk factors for postoperative complications. Conclusions: The diagnosis of colorectal cancer via the screening program is associated with a lower rate of postoperative minor complications and a shorter hospital stay.
Share Button
New comment
Comments
No comments for this article
References
1. Globocan 2012 - Home [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 28]. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx.
2. Roxburgh CSD, McTaggart F, Balsitis M, Diament RH. Impact of the bowel-screening programme on the diagnosis of colorectal cancer in Ayrshire and Arran. Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jan;15(1):34–41.
3. Mackay C, Ramsay G, Rafferty A, Loudon M. Impact of the Scottish Bowel Cancer Screening Programme on patient and tumour characteristics at a single centre. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;20(1):7–11.
4. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, Snover DC, Bradley GM, Schuman LM, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med. 1993 May 13;328(19):1365–71.
5. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, Moss SM, Amar SS, Balfour TW, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996 Nov 30;348(9040):1472–7.
6. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jørgensen OD, Søndergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996 Nov 30;348(9040):1467–71.
7. Towler BP, Irwig L, Glasziou P, Weller D, Kewenter J. Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, hemoccult. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2000 Jan;(2):CD001216.
8. Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Watson E, Towler B, Irwig L. Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jun;103(6):1541–9.
9. Estrategia en cáncer del Sistema Nacional de Salud. Madrid: Ministerio de Sani- dad y Consumo; 2006. 279 p. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 28]. Available from: http://www.msssi.gob.es/eu/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/pdf/excelencia/cancer-cardiopatia/CANCER/opsc_est1.pdf.pdf
10. Estrategia en Cáncer del Sistema Nacional de Salud Actualización aprobada por el Consejo Interterritorial del Sistema Nacional de Salud, el 22 de octubre de 2009 [Internet].[cited 2015 Mar 28]. Available from: http://www.msssi.gob.es/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/pdf/ActualizacionEstrategiaCancer.pdf
11. Amri R, Bordeianou LG, Sylla P, Berger DL. Impact of screening colonoscopy on outcomes in colon cancer surgery. JAMA Surg. 2013 Aug;148(8):747–54.
12. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187–96.
13. Ostenfeld EB, Nørgaard M, Thomsen RW, Iversen LH, Jacobsen JB, Søgaard M. Comorbidity and survival of Danish patients with colon and rectal cancer from 2000-2011: a population-based cohort study. Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jan;5(Suppl 1):65–74.
14. Libby G, Brewster DH, Steele RJC. Impact of faecal occult blood test screening on emergency admissions and short-term outcomes for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2014 Nov;101(12):1607–15.
15. Gunka I, Dostalik J, Martinek L, Gunkova P, Mazur M. Impact of blood transfusions on survival and recurrence in colorectal cancer surgery. Indian J Surg. 2013 Apr;75(2):94–101.
16. Schiergens TS, Rentsch M, Kasparek MS, Frenes K, Jauch K-W, Thasler WE. Impact of perioperative allogeneic red blood cell transfusion on recurrence and overall survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Jan;58(1):74–82.
17. Kuzu MA, Terzioğlu H, Genç V, Erkek AB, Ozban M, Sonyürek P, et al. Preoperative nutritional risk assessment in predicting postoperative outcome in patients undergoing major surgery. World J Surg. 2006 Mar;30(3):378–90.
18. Gibbs J, Cull W, Henderson W, Daley J, Hur K, Khuri SF. Preoperative serum albumin level as a predictor of operative mortality and morbidity: results from the National VA Surgical Risk Study. Arch Surg. 1999 Jan;134(1):36–42.
19. Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE, Oprian CA, Vernava AM, Wade TP, et al. Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Jan;43(1):83–91.
20. Kudsk KA, Tolley EA, DeWitt RC, Janu PG, Blackwell AP, Yeary S, et al. Preoperative albumin and surgical site identify surgical risk for major postoperative complications. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003 Jan;27(1):1–9.
21. McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg. 2015 Feb 19;102(5):462–79.
22. Chima CS, Barco K, Dewitt MLA, Maeda M, Teran JC, Mullen KD. Relationship of Nutritional Status to Length of Stay, Hospital Costs, and Discharge Status of Patients Hospitalized in the Medicine Service. J Am Diet Assoc. 1997 Sep;97(9):975–8.
23. Lis CG, Gupta D, Lammersfeld CA, Markman M, Vashi PG. Role of nutritional status in predicting quality of life outcomes in cancer--a systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Nutr J. 2012 Jan;11:27.
24. Sun L-C, Chu K-S, Cheng S-C, Lu C-Y, Kuo C-H, Hsieh J-S, et al. Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen, albumin and age are supplementary to UICC staging systems in predicting survival for colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment. BMC Cancer. 2009 Jan;9:288.
25.Boonpipattanapong T, Chewatanakornkul S. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and albumin in predicting survival in patients with colon and rectal carcinomas. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Aug;40(7):592–5.
26. Gupta D, Lis CG. Pretreatment serum albumin as a predictor of cancer survival: A systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Nutr J. 2010 Jan;9(1):69.
27. Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, Horie T, Kubota K. Inflammation-Based Prognostic Score Is a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Outcome in Patients With Colorectal Cancer. Ann Surg. 2007 Dec;246(6):1047–51.
28. Alves A, Yves Panis, Danielle Trancar A. Factors Associated with Clinically Significant Anastomotic Leakage after Large Bowel Resection: Multivariate Analysis of 707 Patients. World J Surg. 2002 Jun 15;26(4):499–502.
29. Fazio VW, Tekkis PP, Remzi F, Lavery IC. Assessment of Operative Risk in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Colorectal Cancer Model. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Dec;47(12):2015–24.
30. Lemmens VEPP, Janssen-Heijnen MLG, Verheij CDGW, Houterman S, Repelaer van Driel OJ, Coebergh JWW. Co-morbidity leads to altered treatment and worse survival of elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005 May;92(5):615–23.
Related articles

Letter

Retroperitoneal enterogenous cyst combined with teratoma

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9799/2023

Letter

Surgical indication of type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9681/2023

Letter

Intestinal obstruction due to pneumatosis intestinalis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9608/2023

Letter

Duodenal stenosis surgical treatment in Crohn’s disease

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9521/2023

Digestive Diseases Image

Spontaneous regression of a rectal cancer

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9486/2023

Letter

Vaginal lesion as first manifestation of colorectal disease

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9270/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

An unusual cause of a protuberant lesion of the gastric antrum

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8771/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor abscess

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8580/2022

Review

A review of the diagnosis and management of liver hydatid cyst

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.7896/2021

Letter

Radical surgery for liver hydatidosis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.7743/2020

Editorial

Screening guide for hepatitis C virus infection in Spain

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7728/2020

Digestive Diseases Image

Duodenal diverticulum causing obstructive jaundice – Lemmel’s syndrome

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7516/2020

Review

Inflammatory bowel disease and solid organ transplantation

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7361/2020

Review

New non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer screening

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7233/2020

Special Article

Strategy for the Elimination of Hepatitis C in Cantabria

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7108/2020

Letter

Medullary colorectal carcinoma. Do we really know it?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6728/2019

Letter

Bezoar in incarcerated and complicated hiatal hernia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6159/2019

Editorial

Safe surgery for cystic tumors of the pancreas

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6042/2018

Letter

The rectosigmoid junction: are limits important?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5983/2018

Editorial

Colorectal cancer screening and survival

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5870/2018

Letter

Why anal cytology is not enough in a dysplasia screening program

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5678/2018

Letter to the Editor

Consequences of a Dieulafoy’s lesion in gastric surgery

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5442/2017

Letter to the Editor

Abdominal compartment syndrome secondary to acute necrotizing pancreatitis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4810/2016

Original

Usefulness of an intra-gastric balloon before bariatric surgery

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4624/2016

Letter to the Editor

Liver metastasis from colorectal cancer 12 years after liver transplantation

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4507/2016

Letter to the Editor

Transanal submucosal endoscopic resection (TASER) by TEO system®

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4154/2015

Review

Serrated lesions and serrated polyposis syndrome

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4065/2015

Letter to the Editor

Endobronchial metastases of colorectal cancer

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4080/2015

Letter to the Editor

Minimally invasive treatment of rectovesical fistula: A case report

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4017/2015

Case Report

Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the rectum: an atypical histology

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.3975/2015

Citation tools
Sebastian E, Courtier R, Macià F, Grande L, Pera M. The impact of screening on short-term outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer. 4569/2016


Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Metrics
This article has received 948 visits.
This article has been downloaded 206 times.

Statistics from Dimensions


Statistics from Plum Analytics

Publication history

Received: 02/08/2016

Accepted: 14/03/2017

Online First: 08/06/2017

Published: 30/06/2017

Article revision time: 200 days

Article Online First time: 310 days

Article editing time: 332 days


Share
This article has been rated by 1 readers.
Reader rating:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology is the official organ of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Cookie policy Privacy Policy Legal Notice © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology