Year 2020 / Volume 112 / Number 11
Original
Index of the Mayo Endoscopy and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopy Index of Severity: are they equally valid?

821-825

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6832/2019

María Belvis Jiménez, Pedro Hergueta-Delgado, Blas José Gómez Rodríguez, Belén Maldonado Pérez, Luisa Castro Laria, Manuel Rodríguez-Téllez, María Luisa Morales Barroso, María Dolores Galván Fernández, María Fernanda Guerra Veloz, Victoria Alejandra Jiménez García, Rafael Romero Castro, Antonio Benítez Roldán, Cristina Castro Márquez, Reyes Aparcero López, Antonio Garrido Serrano, Ángel Caunedo Álvarez, Federico Argüelles Arias,

Abstract
Introduction: endoscopy plays an essential role in the management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), as it allows us to visualize and assess the severity of the disease. Different scores have been devised to standardize the findings because such assessments are not always objective. Aims: the aim of this study was to assess the interobserver variability between the Index of Mayo Endoscopy (IME) and the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopy Index of Severity (UCEIS), analyzing the severity of the endoscopic lesions in patients with UC. The secondary aim was to analyze if the cathartic preparation affected the degree of concordance amongst the endoscopists. Material and methods: this was a single-cohort observational, comparative study in which a colonoscopy was performed in patients with UC, as the normal clinical practice. The results were classified according to the IME and the UCEIS by three endoscopic specialists. In order to assess the degree of interobserver correlation, the Kappa index for IME was used and the intraclass correlation coefficient was used for UCEIS. Results: sixty-seven patients were included in the study. The average age was 51 (SD ± 16.7) and the average Mayo Clinic index was 3.07 (SD ± 2.54). The weighted Kappa index between endoscopists A and B for the IME was 0.8, 0.52 between A and C and 0.49 between B and C. The intraclass correlation coefficient for UCEIS was 0.922 between the three endoscopists (95 % CI: 0.832-0.959). A better interobserver correlation was found when the cathartic preparation was ≥ 8 based on the Boston Scale. Conclusions: there was a higher correlation between the different endoscopists for the UCEIS than for the IME. Thus, this should be considered to be the best index to use in the clinical practice. A good cleansing preparation is important to improve the interobserver correlation.
Share Button
New comment
Comments
No comments for this article
Related articles

Letter

Broadening perspectives in the treatment of chronic pouchitis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10865/2024

Letter

Tofacitinib-induced eosinophilia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9831/2023

Letter

Perianal Paget’s disease

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9304/2022

Letter

Chinese dragon sign of ulcerative colitis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9154/2022

Letter

Ulcerative colitis exacerbated by strongyloidiasis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9044/2022

Review

Clinical settings with tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8660/2022

Letter

Mesalazine induced interstitial pneumonitis in the COVID era

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8635/2021

Letter

The effect of Adacolumn® on ulcerative colitis with COVID-19

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7156/2020

Letter

Sweet syndrome in severe ulcerative flare

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6995/2020

Letter to the Editor

Ulcerative colitis with gastric and duodenal involvement

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4685/2016

Editorial

Specialist care in the management of inflammatory bowel disease

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4628/2016

Original

Mercaptopurine and inflammatory bowel disease: the other thiopurine

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4546/2016

Case Report

Mesalamine-induced myopericarditis - A case report

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4016/2015

Citation tools
Belvis Jiménez M, Hergueta-Delgado P, Gómez Rodríguez B, Maldonado Pérez B, Castro Laria L, Rodríguez-Téllez M, et all. Index of the Mayo Endoscopy and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopy Index of Severity: are they equally valid?. 6832/2019


Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Metrics
This article has received 1610 visits.
This article has been downloaded 348 times.

Statistics from Dimensions


Statistics from Plum Analytics

Publication history

Received: 18/12/2019

Accepted: 10/02/2020

Online First: 15/10/2020

Published: 10/11/2020

Article revision time: 32 days

Article Online First time: 302 days

Article editing time: 328 days


Share
This article has been rated by 6 readers.
Reader rating:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology is the official organ of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Cookie policy Privacy Policy Legal Notice © Copyright 2024 y Creative Commons. The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology