Year 2019 / Volume 111 / Number 12
Original
Randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of a visual educational leaflet on the preparation of colonoscopies in hospitalized patients

946-952

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6317/2019

Antonio Guardiola-Arévalo, Alicia Granja Navacerrada, Francisco Javier García-Alonso, Pilar Bernal Checa, Rubén Piqué Becerra, Ivan Guerra, Alicia Algaba, Eva de Andrés Esteban, Fernando Bermejo,

Abstract
Background: the safety and diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopies depends on the quality of colon cleansing. Several factors have been reported that affect the quality of bowel cleansing, hospitalization being one of them. Aims: the aim of the study was to investigate whether a visual educational leaflet improved the level of cleanliness achieved in hospitalized patients undergoing a colonoscopy and to identify predictors of a poor bowel preparation. Methods: a prospective, single-center, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial was performed. The intervention group was given a visual educational leaflet and both groups received four liters of polyethylene glycol solution. Demographic data, personal history, reason for admission and indication for colonoscopy, work shift during which the procedure was performed and endoscopy findings were collected. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) was used to assess the bowel preparation. Results: one hundred and thirty-six patients were included in the study; 51.5% were male, with a mean age of 64.3 ± 17.6 years. The educational leaflet did not result in a difference in the total BBPS obtained between the standard group and the intervention group (7 [6-9] vs 6 [5.7-9]; p = 0.17). According to the multivariable analysis, the only factors associated with a poor bowel cleansing were heart disease (OR 3.37 [1.34-8.46]; p = 0.010) and colorectal cancer (OR 3.82 [1.26-11.61]; p = 0.018). Conclusion: the use of a visual educational leaflet for the preparation of colonoscopies did not provide a significant improvement in hospitalized patients in our health area. Heart disease was identified as the only predictor of poor preparation for colonoscopy.
Share Button
New comment
Comments
No comments for this article
References
1. Gonzalez-Huix Lladó F, Figa Francesch M, Huertas Nadal C. Essential quality criteria in the indication and performance of colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010 Jan;33(1):33-42.
2. Morán Sánchez S, Torrella E, Esteban Delgado P, et al. Colonoscopy quality assessment. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2009 Feb;101(2):107-12, 112-6.
3. Jover R, Herráiz M, Alarcón O, et al. Clinical practice Guidelines: quality of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Endoscopy 2012; 44:444-51.
4. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58:76-9.
5. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: The European panel of appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy european multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61:378-84.
6. Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1696 – 700.
7. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001; 96:1797-1802.
8. Belsey J, Epstein, Heresbach D. Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 25: 373–84.
9. Tan JJ, Tjandra JJ. Which is the optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy— a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8: 247 – 58.
10. Rex DK. Dosing considerations in the use of sodium phosphate bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Ann Pharmacother 2007; 41: 1466–75.
11. Park JS, Sohn CI, Hwang SJ, et al. Quality and effect of single dose versus split dose of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for early-morning colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 616 – 9.
12. Unger RZ, Amstutz SP, Seo DH, et al. Willingness to undergo split-dose instructions. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 2030–4.
13. Bucci C, Rotondano G, Hassan C, et al. Optimal bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: split the dose! A series of meta-analyses of controlled studies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 80(4):566-576.
14. Spiegel BM, Talley J, Shekelle P, et al. Development and validation of a novel patient educational booklet to enhance colonoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011; 106(5):875-83.
15. Rosenfeld G, Krygier D, Enns RA, et al. The impact of patient education on the quality of inpatient bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol. 2010;24(9):543-6.
16. Ergen WF, Pasricha T, Hubbard FJ, et al. Providing Hospitalized Patients with an Educational Booklet Increases the Quality of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(6):858-864.
17. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: A valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69:620-625.
18. Calderwood AH, Jacobson BC. Comprehensive validation of the Boston bowel preparation scale. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72:686-92.
19. Calderwood AH, Schroy PC 3rd, Lieberman DA, et al. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80:269–276.
20. Calderwood AH, Lai EJ, Fix OK, et al. An endoscopist-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of a simple visual aid to improve bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73:307–314.
21. Tae JW, Lee JC, Hong SJ, et al. Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76:804–811.
22. Shaikh AA, Hussain SM, Rahn S, et al. Effect of an educational pamphlet on colon cancer screening: a randomized, prospective trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 22:444–449.
23. Coombes JM, Steiner JF, Bekelman DB, et al. Clinical outcomes associated with attempts to educate patients about lower endoscopy: a narrative review. J Community Health 2008; 33:149–157.
24. Lebwohl B, Wang T. C, and Neugut A. I. Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 2010; 55 (7): 2014–2020.
25. Reilly T, Walker G. Reasons for poor colonic preparation with inpatients. Gastroenterol Nursing 2004; 27:115–117.
26. Chorev N, Chadad B, Segal N, et al. Preparation for colonoscopy in hospitalized patients. Dig Dis Sci 2007; 52:835–839.
27. McNabb-Baltar J, Dorreen A, Al Dhahab H, et al. Age Is the Only Predictor of Poor Bowel Preparation in the Hospitalized Patient. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:2139264.
28. Cappell M. S, Abboud R. The impact of advances in instrumentation and techniques of colonoscopy from 1988 to 2008 on inpatient colonoscopy performance at a high volume endoscopy unit in the United States: significantly shorter procedure time, higher completion rate, performance on sicker inpatients, and near disappearance of flexible sigmoidoscopy. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 2010; 55 (12): 3521–3529.
29. Chung YW, Han DS, Park KH, et al. Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol a prospective study in Korea. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 2009; 43: 448–452.
30. Fatima H, Johnson C.S, Rex D.K. Patients’description of rectal effluent and quality of bowel preparation at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jun;71(7):1244-1252.e2.
31. Borg B. B, Gupta N. K, Zuckerman G. R, et al. Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2009; 7(6): 670–675.
32. Chan W.-K, Saravanan A, Manikam J, et al. Appointment waiting times and education level influence the quality of bowel preparation in adult patients undergoing colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterology 2011; 11(86).
33. Harewood G. C, V. Sharma K, Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2003; 58 (1): 76–79.
34. Hendry P. O, Jenkins J. T, Diament R. H. The impact of poor bowel preparation on colonoscopy: a prospective single centre study of 10 571 colonoscopies. Colorectal Disease 2007; 9 (8): 745–748.
35. Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M, et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2011; 73 (6): 1207–1214.
Related articles

Digestive Diseases Image

Underwater polypectomy at the appendiceal orifice in a patient on anticoagulation

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9842/2023

Letter

An uncommon colonic polyp

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9160/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Intestinal obstruction due to bariolith impaction

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9084/2022

Letter

Anorectal malignant melanoma, a diagnostic challenge

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9068/2022

Letter

Lead ingestion, medical emergency and action plan

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9048/2022

Letter

Endoscopic findings of radiation ileitis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9036/2022

Letter

Endoscopic imaging of pneumatosis intestinalis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8972/2022

Editorial

Colonoscopy — When quality matters

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8942/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Colonic Kaposi’s sarcoma as the first clinical manifestation of undiagnosed HIV

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8717/2022

Letter

Gastrointestinal lymphoma, a rare endoscopic lesion

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8555/2021

Letter

Cecal MALT lymphoma: a challenging diagnosis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8526/2021

Letter

Surprises in cecal intubation: foreign bodies in the colon

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8155/2021

Digestive Diseases Image

Phlebosclerotic colitis: an unusual cause of abdominal pain and hematochezia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7358/2020

Case Report

Primary colon mantle lymphoma: a misleading macroscopic appearance!

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6405/2019

Digestive Diseases Image

Colorectal penetration by two intrauterine devices

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5974/2018

Editorial

Colorectal cancer screening and survival

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5870/2018

Letter

Bacterial endogenous endophthalmitis after colonoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5658/2018

Review

Quality indicators in colonoscopy. The colonoscopy procedure

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5408/2017

Letter to the Editor

A rare complication after colonoscopy: a splenic rupture

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5362/2017

Letter to the Editor

Acute appendicitis after a colonic endoscopic submucosal resection

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5307/2017

Digestive Diseases Image

Contribution of the virtual colonoscopy in a case of intestinal intussusception

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5261/2017

Digestive Diseases Image

A bull horn fragment found on colonoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5020/2017

Editorial

Issue pending: minimizing anxiety before colonoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4756/2016

Digestive Diseases Image

Intrauterine device in the rectal cavity

Letter to the Editor

Primary chancre in the rectum: an underdiagnosed cause of rectal ulcer

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4457/2016

Digestive Diseases Image

Pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis

Letter to the Editor

Splenic rupture after colorectal cancer screening

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2015.3714/2015

Citation tools
Guardiola-Arévalo A, Granja Navacerrada A, García-Alonso F, Bernal Checa P, Piqué Becerra R, Guerra I, et all. Randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of a visual educational leaflet on the preparation of colonoscopies in hospitalized patients. 6317/2019


Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Metrics
This article has received 1300 visits.
This article has been downloaded 266 times.

Statistics from Dimensions


Statistics from Plum Analytics

Publication history

Received: 02/04/2019

Accepted: 31/07/2019

Online First: 22/11/2019

Published: 05/12/2019

Article revision time: 113 days

Article Online First time: 234 days

Article editing time: 247 days


Share
This article hasn't been rated yet.
Reader rating:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology is the official organ of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Cookie policy Privacy Policy Legal Notice © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology