Year 2020 / Volume 112 / Number 12
Review
Endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors: a meta-analysis

941-947

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6681/2019

Hong-Jing Zhao, Jie Yin, Cui-Ying Ji, Xin Wang, Na Wang,

Abstract
Objective: to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). Methods: a systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI and WANFANG databases. The related references were selected according to certain inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Cochrane Collaboration’s Revman 5.3 software was used for data analysis. Results: a total of 12 studies were included in the analysis. The total number of lesions was 3,062 (EMR: 1,906; ESD: 1,156). The en-bloc resection rate of ESD was 95 % (1,098/1,156), which was significantly higher than that of EMR (42.8 %, 815/1,906) (OR = 0.07, 95 % CI [0.02, 0.07], p < 0.00001). The complete resection rate of ESD was 93.2 % (109/117), which was significantly higher than that of EMR as well (71.9 %, 92/128) (OR = 0.12, 95 % CI [0.05, 0.29], p < 0.00001). The bleeding rate showed no significant difference between EMR and ESD (4.2 % vs 3.5 %) (OR = 1.04, 95 % CI [0.68, 1.60], p = 0.85). The perforation rates of EMR and ESD were 1.8 % and 2.4 %, respectively, which displayed a significant difference (OR = 0.56, 95 % CI [0.32, 0.97], p = 0.04). Nevertheless, the recurrence rate of EMR was significantly higher than that of ESD (15.9 % vs 0.5 %) (OR = 23.06, 95 % CI [11.11, 47.85], p < 0.00001). Conclusions: endoscopic resection of LSTs is safe and effective. As compared with EMR, ESD has higher en-bloc and complete resection rates but a lower recurrence rate. Therefore, ESD is highly recommended for the treatment of LSTs.
Share Button
New comment
Comments
No comments for this article
References
1.Oka S, Tanaka S, Kanao H, et al. Therapeutic strategy for colorectal laterally spreading tumor[J]. Digestive Endoscospy, 2009, Suppl 1:S43-46.
2.Saito Y, Fujii T, Kondo H, et al. Endoscopic treatment for laterally spreading tumors in the colon[J]. Endoscopy, 2001, 33:682-686.
1.Oka S, Tanaka S, Kanao H, et al. Therapeutic strategy for colorectal laterally spreading tumor[J]. Digestive Endoscospy, 2009, Suppl 1:S43-46.
2.Saito Y, Fujii T, Kondo H, et al. Endoscopic treatment for laterally spreading tumors in the colon[J]. Endoscopy, 2001, 33:682-686.
3.Terasaki M, Tanaka S, Oka S, et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading tumors larger than 20 mm[J]. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2012, 27:734-740.
4.Uraoka T, Saito Y, Matsuda T, et al. Endoscopic indications for endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading tumours in the colorectum[J]. Gut, 2006, 55:1592-1597.
5.Oka S, Tanaka S, Saito Y et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter prospective study in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110:697-707.
6.Bogie RMM, Veldman MHJ, Snijders LARS, et al. Endoscopic subtypes of colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) and the risk of submucosal invasion: a meta-analysis.Endoscopy, 2018. 50:263-282.
7.Tamegai Y, Saito Y, Masaki N, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a safe technique for colorectal tumors[J]. Endoscopy, 2007, 39:418-422.
8.Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y, et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video) [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2010, 72:1217-1225.
9.Nishiyama H, Isomoto H, Yamaguchi N,et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading tumours of the colorectum in 200 consecutive cases[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24:2881-2887.
10.Da HJ, Youn YH, Kim JH, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors:is it feasible? [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2014, 81:614-620.
11.Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRIMAS statement reporting for systematic review and meta-analyses of studies of evaluate health care interventions:explanation and elaboration[J]. J.Clin.Epidemiol, 2009, 62,1-34.
12.Hu JC. Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) for Treating Colorectal Laterally Spreading Tumors (LSTs): Comparison with Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR). Zhongshan University 2010; 1-34.
13.Jia GF, Shan H, Zhu LS et al. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of large intestine lateral developmental tumor: analysis of 41 cases. Chin J Dig Endosc 2012; 29:107-108.
14.Komeda Y, Kashida H, Sakurai T, et al. Treatment of colorectal LST: Focus on EMR techniques[J]. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia), 2015, 30:191.
15.Lee H S, Jeon S W. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors over 20 mm in diameter[J]. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia), 2014, 29:293.
16.Li SR, Li YX, Shen L,Luo HS. Clinical observation of EMR and ESD intreating laterally spreading tumor by FICE. Chin J Clin Gastroenterol 2014; 26:87-90.
17.Lin Y. Clinicopathological and Endoscopic Treatment of Laterally Spreading Tumor(LST): a Retrospective Analysis. Fujian University of Medicine 2012; 1-48.
18.Nakae K, Sakamoto N, Osada T, et al. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large superficial colorectal tumor[J]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2010, 71:AB340.
19.Sakamoto N, Ritsuno H, Osada T, et al. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large superficial colorectal tumor[J]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2011, 73:AB390.
20.Su H, Liu M, Chen JZ et al. The effeicy of Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of colorectal laterally spreading tumors. Chin J Dig Endosc 2014; 31:46-8.
21.Sudo K, Kudo S E, Hayashi T, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors over 20 mm in diameter[J]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2011,73:AB299.
22.Tanaka H, Saito Y, Nakamura F, et al. Comparision of clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal tumors at two asiapacific expert centers:a prospective cohort studiey[J]. United European Gastroendoscopy Journal, 2013, 1:A177.
23.Terasaki M, Tanaka S, Nakayama N, et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading tumors larger than 20 mm[J]. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2012, 27:734-740.
24.Hong YM, Kim HW, Park SB, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision for the treatment of large sessilepolyps and laterally spreading tumors of the colorectum. Clin Endosc. 2015, 48:52-58.
25.Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y, et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video) [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2010, 72:1217-1225.
26.Tamegai Y, Saito Y, Masaki N, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a safe technique for colorectal tumors. Endoscopy. 2007, 39:418-22.
27.Yoon JY, Kim JH, Lee JY, et al. Clinical outcomes for patients with perforations during endoscopic submucosal dissection of laterally spreading tumors of the colorectum. Surg Endosc. 2013, 27:487-93.
28.Jung JS, Hong JY, Oh HH, et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors with advanced histology. Surg Endosc. 2019, 33:2562-2571.
29.Fujiya M, Tanaka K, Dokoshi T, et al. Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosaldissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015, 81:583-595.
30.De Ceglie A, Hassan C, Mangiavillano B, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016, 104:138-155.
31.Bourke M. Current status of colonic endoscopic mucosal resection in the west and the interface with endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc. 2009, 21 Suppl 1:S22-27.
32.Saito Y, Otake Y, Sakamoto T, et al. Indications for and technical aspects of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gut Liver. 2013, 7:263-269.
Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Snauwaert C, Moreels TG, et al. Risk factors for conversion to snare resection during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in an expert Western center. Endoscopy. 2019,51:152-160.
2.For reference 22, I did not find the full text at that time, which was also mentioned in the paper.At present, I have contacted the author and am waiting for his reply.For reference 12, it's a graduate thesis.
Related articles

Letter

A case of achalasia associated with early esophageal cancer

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10177/2023

Letter

An early-stage primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the colon

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.10016/2023

Digestive Diseases Image

Sustained silence of a small signet ring cell carcinoma

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9891/2023

Letter

Pseudo-submucosal tumor in the colon: seeing is believing

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9773/2023

Digestive Diseases Image

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of an anorectal Condyloma acuminatum

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9622/2023

Letter

Successful endoscopic removal of a giant duodenal bulb mass

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8595/2022

Editorial

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection is here to stay

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6960/2020

Letter

Endoscopic mucosal resection for cap poliposis treatment

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6537/2019

Digestive Diseases Image

A rare mass in the duodenal bulb: Brunner’s glands cystadenoma

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5344/2017

Letter to the Editor

Gastric neuroendocrine tumor presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2015.3998/2015

Letter to the Editor

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for a gastric fibrolipoma

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2015.3982/2015

Citation tools
Zhao H, Yin J, Ji C, Wang X, Wang N. Endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors: a meta-analysis. 6681/2019


Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Metrics
This article has received 1652 visits.
This article has been downloaded 301 times.

Statistics from Dimensions


Statistics from Plum Analytics

Publication history

Received: 12/10/2019

Accepted: 15/03/2020

Online First: 19/11/2020

Published: 09/12/2020

Article revision time: 146 days

Article Online First time: 404 days

Article editing time: 424 days


Share
This article has been rated by 1 readers.
Reader rating:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology is the official organ of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Cookie policy Privacy Policy Legal Notice © Copyright 2024 y Creative Commons. The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology