Year 2022 / Volume 114 / Number 9
Letter
An analysis of retracted articles in the field of pancreatic diseases

566-567

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8817/2022

Jiao Jiang, Shu Huang, Wensen Ren, Kang Zou, Xinyi Zeng, Yan Peng, Muhan Lü, Xiaowei Tang,

Abstract
Background: Review of retracted articles has a positive impact on scientific research. The aim of our study was to examine the characteristics of retracted articles in the field of pancreatic diseases. Methods: The Retraction Watch database was queried for retractions in pancreatic diseases on 7 March 2021, and the filters set were as follows: (1) the Title typed in was “pancreatitis”, “pancreas”, or “pancreatic”; (2) the Nature of notice selected was “retraction”. Results: A total of 116 retracted articles were identified as pancreatic disease-related, with over two-thirds of them pertaining to pancreatic cancer. Research article was the most common article type among these retractions. Common reasons given for retraction included scientific fraud (37.1%), duplication (26.7%), and reliability (25%). China had the largest number of retractions (n=51), followed by the United States (n=47). Most articles were retracted in recent years, particularly after 2015. Conclusions: A large proportion of retracted articles pertaining to pancreatic diseases have been retracted in recent years. The majority of publications—over three quarters—were retracted for authors who committed some type of misconduct. Differences between countries in the manner of misconduct were stark.
Share Button
New comment
Comments
No comments for this article
References
1.Korpela KM. How long does it take for the scientific literature to purge itself of fraudulent material?: the Breuning case revisited. Curr Med Res Opin 2010;26:843-847.
2.Armond ACV, Gordijn B, Lewis J, et al. A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases. BMC Med Ethics 2021;22:50.
3.The Retraction Watch Database. Accessed 7 March 2021. Available at: http://ret‌ractiondatabase.org/.
4.Jiang J, Lü M, Tang X. Analysis of retracted articles in the field of Gastroenterology. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2022 Mar 14. doi: 10.17235/reed.2022.8760/2022. Online ahead of print.
5.Qi X, Deng H, Guo X. Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview. Postgrad Med J 2017;93:499-503.
Citation tools
Jiang J, Huang S, Ren W, Zou K, Zeng X, Peng Y, et all. An analysis of retracted articles in the field of pancreatic diseases. 8817/2022


Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Metrics
This article has received 1452 visits.
This article has been downloaded 89 times.

Statistics from Dimensions


Statistics from Plum Analytics

Publication history

Received: 25/03/2022

Accepted: 28/03/2022

Online First: 04/04/2022

Published: 07/09/2022

Article Online First time: 10 days

Article editing time: 166 days


Share
This article hasn't been rated yet.
Reader rating:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology is the official organ of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Cookie policy Privacy Policy Legal Notice © Copyright 2024 y Creative Commons. The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology