References
REFERENCES:
1. National Cancer Institute [Internet]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html.
2. O. Hosokawa, S. Shirasaki, Y. Kaizaki, et al., Invasive Colorectal Cancer Detected up to 3 Years after a Colonoscopy Negative for Cancer. Endoscopy, 2003. 35(6): p. 506-510.
3. Ferrandez, A., Navarro, M., Díez, M., et al., Risk factors for advanced lesions undetected at prior colonoscopy: not always poor preparation. Endoscopy, 2010. 42(12): p. 1071-1076.
4. Adler, J. and D.J. Robertson, Interval Colorectal Cancer After Colonoscopy: Exploring Explanations and Solutions. Am J Gastroenterol, 2015. 110(12): p. 1657-1664; quiz 1665.
5. Murino, A., C. Hassan, and A. Repici, The diminutive colon polyp: biopsy, snare, leave alone? Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2016. 32(1): p. 38-43.
6. Pohl, H., Srivastava, A., Bensen, S.P., et al., Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology, 2013. 144(1): p. 74-80 e1.
7. Cha, J.M., Colonoscopy Quality is the Answer for the Emerging Issue of Interval Cancer. Intest Res, 2014. 12(2): p. 110-116.
8. Pabby A, S.R., Weissfeld JL, et al., Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc, 2005. 61: p. 385-391.
9. Robertson, D.J., Lieberman, D.A., Winawer, S.J., et al., Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut, 2014. 63(6): p. 949-956.
10. Rutter, M.D., Senore, C., Bisschops, R., et al., The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: developing performance measures. Endoscopy, 2016. 48(1): p. 81-89.
11. Corley, D.A., Jensen, C.D., Marks, A.R., et al., Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med, 2014. 370(14): p. 1298-1306.
12. Francis, D.L., Rodríguez Correa, D.T., Buchner, A., et al., Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc, 2011. 73(3): p. 493-497.
13. Williams, J.E., J.L. Holub, and D.O. Faigel, Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database. Gastrointest Endosc, 2012. 75(3): p. 576-582.
14. Dominitz, J.A. and D.J. Robertson, Interval cancers: learning from the past as we build for the future. Am J Gastroenterol, 2013. 108(8): p. 1341-1343.
15. Shaukat, A., Arain, M., Thaygarajan, B., et al., Is BRAF mutation associated with interval colorectal cancers? Dig Dis Sci, 2010. 55(8): p. 2352-2356.
16. Ruiz, L.M., Colonoscopias de vigilancia: riesgo de neoplasia colorrectal. Gastroenterología y Hepatología, 2013. 36: p. 80-85.
17. Singh, S., Singh, P.P., Murad, M.H., et al., Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of interval colorectal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol, 2014. 109(9): p. 1375-1389.
18. Xiang, L., Zhan, Q., Zhao, X.H., et al., Risk factors associated with missed colorectal flat adenoma: a multicenter retrospective tandem colonoscopy study. World J Gastroenterol, 2014. 20(31): p. 10927-10937.
19. Winawer, S.J., Zauber, A.G., Fletcher, R.H., et al., Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology, 2006. 130(6): p. 1872-1885.
20. Rex, D.K., Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc, 2000. 51(1): p. 33-36.
21. Jover, R., Zapater, P., Bujanda, L., et al., Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy. Endoscopy, 2016. 48(3): p. 241-247.
22. Kaminski, M.F., Regula, J., Kraszeuska, E., et al., Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med, 2010. 362(19): p. 1795-1803.23.
23. Rex, D.K., et al., Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc, 2015. 81(1): p. 31-53.
24. van Doorn, S.C., Van Vliet, J., Fockens, P., et al., A novel colonoscopy reporting system enabling quality assurance. Endoscopy, 2014. 46(3): p. 181-187.
25. Baxter, N.N., Sutradhar, R., Forbes, S.S., et al., Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology, 2011. 140(1): p. 65-72.
26. Morris, E.J., et al., Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) rates vary considerably depending on the method used to calculate them: a retrospective observational population-based study of PCCRC in the English National Health Service. Gut, 2015. 64(8): p. 1248-56.
27. Ruiz-Rebollo, M.L., et al., Aetiology and prevalence of post-colonoscopy colorrectal cancer. Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016.
28. Munoz Garcia-Borruel, M., et al., Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: Characteristics and predictive factors. Med Clin (Barc), 2017.
29. Lieberman, D. and R. Mascarenhas, Adenoma detection rate: in search of quality improvement, not just measurement. Gastrointest Endosc, 2015. 82(4): p. 683-685.